On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Mon, Apr 23, 2007 at 04:57:30PM -0700, Daniel Rall wrote: > > Well, I'm not particularly happy about it. I'd rather see someone fix > > svnmerge.py to DTRT, rather than use the proposed lossy handling. > > Given that no one is stepping up, the lossy handling seems like the > > lesser of two evils. :-\ > > I'm "interested" in fixing svnmerge.py to DTRT, but (a) I probably don't > have time, (b) I need to finish my existing patch and get it submitted, > and (c) I'd hate to spend a lot of time on something that would become > irrelevant in 1.5. Will the need for svnmerge go away?
Eventually, yes. However, svnmerge.py works against a pre-1.5 repository, while core Subversion will require a 1.5 repository to properly do its thing.
pgpZDwUafeoDf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
