On Jul 27, 2007, at 8:35 AM, Michael Willmott wrote: > Dustin J. Mitchell wrote: >> svnmerge is listing the phantom revisions that it merged as well. >> Your >> suggestion, then, is to not list phantom revisions within the merge >> message? How do others feel about this? > > I'm actually in two minds about how to respond to this. On the one > hand > I can understand only listing the revisions that make changes, and on > the other hand I'd like to see the range of revisions I've merged. At > the very least, do not include the phantom revisions that have already > been merged. If these were ommited the previous example would only > contain "11205-11211", which is a lot easier to read.
Well, we could describe the phantom and normal revisions in the log message. Regards, Blair -- Blair Zajac, Ph.D. CTO, OrcaWare Technologies <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subversion training, consulting and support http://www.orcaware.com/svn/ _______________________________________________ Svnmerge mailing list [email protected] http://www.orcaware.com/mailman/listinfo/svnmerge
