On Wednesday, December 29, 2004, at 08:36 AM, Rob Kinyon wrote:
On Wed, 29 Dec 2004, Terrence Brannon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:Tim Bunce [...] said that Safe was a failed experiment and showed no interest in fixing the problem with Safe.
If you have documentation of this, I think it would be good to post to Perlmonks. Safe is still being recommended on a somewhat regular basis and, if Tim Bunce feels it's a failed experiment, that's a problem.
Seconded -- I've been using Safe in production for a while, although in a relatively minor role, and was under the impression that it was generally working and reasonably secure... If that's not the case, it would be good to further advise the community of how and why.
-Simon
_______________________________________________ sw-design mailing list [email protected] http://metaperl.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sw-design
