I initially thought of this as well, but thinking through it further leads to some questions: 1) Are you really going to have such re-usable components? 2) If you do, why aren't they in some sort of child class that you can specify? 3) If you cannot put them in some child class, then all you have is a junk drawer of items that are used in one place in some config file that need unique names. That's a real smell to me ...
Rob On Wed, 29 Dec 2004 10:36:08 -0500, Stevan Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2004, at 8:47 PM, Terrence Brannon wrote: > > I think so. But why not name your subrefs and put them in a module and > > refer to them in a single clean line of config code? > > Hmmmm, Thats a good thought. > > Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > sw-design mailing list > [email protected] > http://metaperl.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sw-design > _______________________________________________ sw-design mailing list [email protected] http://metaperl.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sw-design
