I meant swagger-ui. Turned out it was a webserver issue, sorry. On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 18:10:57 UTC-7, Ron wrote: > > Well, you’re missing more details. Are you talking about swagger-ui? The > spec itself? Are you generating the spec? Manually hosting it? If it’s > generated, how is it generated? > > What exactly do you expect to be updated at runtime that isn’t considering > it’s static? > > > > > > > > *From: *<[email protected] <javascript:>> on behalf of > Systema Sephiroticum <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected] <javascript:>" < > [email protected] <javascript:>> > *Date: *Tuesday, 23 August 2016 at 15:34 > *To: *Swagger <[email protected] <javascript:>> > *Subject: *Re: Does Swagger have some sort of caching mechanism? > > > > Also, I'm using Swagger 2.0 > > On Tuesday, 23 August 2016 15:32:14 UTC-7, Systema Sephiroticum wrote: > > I'm using swagger with Tomcat 7. Even swagger is just a bunch of static > files, I can't seem to bust cache for swagger webpages without restarting > my webserver, and this is true in any browser use. I've never seen anything > like it, and other static files on my webserver outside the Swagger > directory do not have this problem. > > > > Is there something about swagger that it has a ridiculously sticky cache, > and is there anything I can do about it? What am I missing? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Swagger" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] <javascript:>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Swagger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
