Hi, the online generator uses the tagged 2.2.1 release.  Perhaps you’re not 
using that locally?

> On Oct 12, 2016, at 12:48 PM, bimsimsala <elstefan...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
> we're trying to model our domain and API with swagger. We use a 2-level 
> inheritance model and do get different generation results from swagger online 
> editor and offline swagger 2.2.1 generation (library for generation is 
> Spring). 
> 
> An abstracted example is shown in the following yaml:
> 
> swagger: '2.0'
> info:
>   title: API of something
>   description: API
>   version: "1.0.0"
> host: localhost:8081
> schemes:
>   - http
> basePath: /api/v1
> produces:
>   - application/json
> consumes:
>   - application/json
> paths:
>   /implementations:
>     get:
>       description: Get all impls
>       responses:
>         200:
>           description: An array of all impls
>           schema:
>             type: array
>             items:
>               $ref: '#/definitions/Implementation'
> definitions:
>   Implementation:
>     allOf:
>     - $ref: '#/definitions/BaseType'
>     - type: object
>       properties:
>         metaData:
>           type: string
>   BaseType:
>     allOf:
>     - $ref: '#/definitions/IdObject'
>     - type: object
>     - discriminator: baseType
>       properties:
>         baseType: 
>           type: string
>         property:
>           type: string
>       required:
>       - baseType
>   IdObject:
>     discriminator: idObjectType
>     properties:
>       idObjectType:
>         type: string
>       id:
>         type: integer
>         format: int64
>     required:
>     - idObjectType
>     - id
> 
>  
> Summarized inheritance: Implementation extends BaseObject extends IdObject
> 
> The generated code for the model class Implementation is correctly formed 
> when generating with online swagger editor (Implementation extends 
> BaseObject) but not for offline generation using command line 
> 
> swagger-codegen generate -i oath/to/api.yaml -l spring -o /tmp/test/
> 
> 
> Using offline generation BasObject extends IdObject but Implementation is not 
> extending BaseObject (the "extends BaseObject" phrase is missing).
> 
> 2 questions:
> - Is it possible and good practice to use an inheritance structure like we 
> try to do?
> - Is online code generation using a different generator version or parameter 
> set?
> 
> Thank you,
> Stefan
> 
> 
> -- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Swagger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com 
> <mailto:swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Swagger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to swagger-swaggersocket+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to