It was too much to ask several years ago when the project was still young. With 3.0 there is a chance we will have this.
> On Nov 21, 2016, at 11:25 AM, Alexander Henket <[email protected]> wrote: > > That is disappointing. Was standardizing that ever considered? > >> Op 21 nov. 2016, om 20:22 heeft tony tam <[email protected] >> <mailto:[email protected]>> het volgende geschreven: >> >> No, it’s a matter of convention not policy how and where a swagger >> definition is located. >> >>> On Nov 21, 2016, at 11:21 AM, Alexander Henket <[email protected] >>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote: >>> >>> Is there a defined way to find out of service X has a Swagger definition >>> available? E.g. HTTP OPTIONS, a defined endpoint call, a GET with Accept: >>> application/xml+swagger or any other method? > > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Swagger" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected] > <mailto:[email protected]>. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Swagger" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
