[Inline] On 25 February 2015 at 11:31, <p...@ns0.nohats.ca> wrote: > On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Andrew Cagney wrote: > >> New commits: >> commit 7014234166788fe0ff163ef4fb6281587f90b347 >> Author: Andrew Cagney <cag...@gnu.org> >> Date: Mon Feb 23 13:46:31 2015 -0500 >> >> buiding: copy Makefile.inc, Makefile.ver, Makefile.tmp to mk/config.mk, >> mk/version.mk, mk/top.mk >> >> As before have old files include new for now. > > > Does this leave Makefile.inc.local intact in the root dir? Those are used by > people to override the default settings. This also requires a documentation > update and an update to our release scripts :P
That includes me. Makefile.inc.local continues to be the way to override Makefile varibles. I don't think that will ever change. (the way this build system overrides make variables is decidedly non-traditional, I get to live with that). > I kinda prefer Makefile.{ver|inc|inc.local} to be in the root dir. These > have user servicable parts inside. Can you be specific? If there's something that can't be done with Makefile.inc.local then we've a bug. Those files, what ever the location, really should be read-only. _______________________________________________ Swan-commit mailing list Swan-commit@lists.libreswan.org https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-commit