On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Matt Rogers wrote:
Subject: Re: [Swan-dev] naming v2 states
I like the suggested set at the bottom there. I think avoiding calling the
resulting states a CHILD and instead calling them IKE or IPSEC is a good idea.
I also like the idea of incorporating the intended SA type in the CHILD
exchange's state names.
Funny, I was hoping to keep the RFC names for the states, eg to keep
using CREATE_CHILD_XXX despite that it can create parents.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
