I'm not sure I completely follow: On 6 January 2015 at 13:32, Paul Wouters <p...@nohats.ca> wrote:
>> 000 >> 000 IKE algorithms supported: >> +000 >> +000 [...] >> 000 > > > The whole point of this output is to see it though. However, in a lot of > test cases we currently run just "ipsec status" and not "ipsec status |grep > conn name". It leaves critical bits such as: 000 Connection list: 000 000 "westnet-eastnet": 192.0.1.0/24===192.1.2.45<192.1.2.45>[@west]...192.1.2.23<192.1.2.23>[@east]===192.0.2.0/24; unrouted; erout e owner: #0 000 "westnet-eastnet": oriented; my_ip=unset; their_ip=unset ... untouched. It just stripped out the supported IKE algorithm list which, I suspect, only needs to be tested once. > over. The idea here is that only for specific test cases do we want > to see the above output. For example the AES_CTR libreswan test (but > not for the ctr libreswan interop test) > > In the next few weeks we will also work on an "ipsec status" like > command that will list more specific things in a more terse format, > without it being basically a pluto variable dump. So perhaps more > calls to ipsec status can be changed to this new command over time. A more focused command would certainly help. _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list Swan-dev@lists.libreswan.org https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev