Duplicate numbers shouldn't happen I think. Running in Parallel doesn't bode well for reproducibility :)
Sent from my iPhone > On Mar 20, 2015, at 15:09, Andrew Cagney <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 20 March 2015 at 14:37, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Sign. Does anyone have a suggestion for how to do this? >> >> We had some thoughts in the past, not implemented, that we could have >> numbered run files, eg westrun1.sh eastrun2.sh westrun3.sh and that >> those would be executed one after the other. But no code was written >> to implement that. >> > That could work. I'm going to loosely interpret the numbering to mean that > if two ends have the same number, or no number, they get to be run in > parallel. > > Andrew (this is good, it means I'm not mis-reading code) > >
_______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
