On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 11:38:57AM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote: > >To Lennard's idea, I'm not sure we can rely on modification dates. > > Or the date specified in CHANGES of the release.
Yeah I don't trust modification dates either, but anything is better than the current date. Something from CHANGES sounds great. Something consistent that actually indicates the age of the code is what makes sense. Manually editing dates sucks and is error prone for sure. -- Len Sorensen _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
