On Wed, 26 Aug 2015, Lennart Sorensen wrote:
Aug 5 14:50:13 ruggedcom pluto[8239]: "Test" #3: ignoring Delete SA payload:
PROTO_IPSEC_ESP SA(0xbd111c17) not found (our SPI - bogus implementation)
Although why am I not seeing the spi 0xbd111c17 anywhere? Does your bug
report have more plutologs that we can trace down 0xbd111c17 and see if
this is indeed an ESP SPI and not an ISAKMPD SPI?
Aug 11 09:08:22 ruggedcom pluto[25039]: "Test" #44: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec SA
established tunnel mode {ESP=>0xe701c648 <0x43b180e5 xfrm=3DES_0-HMAC_MD5 NATOA=none
NATD=none DPD=none}
Aug 11 09:08:23 ruggedcom pluto[25039]: "Test" #45: transition from state
STATE_QUICK_R1 to state STATE_QUICK_R2
Aug 11 09:08:23 ruggedcom pluto[25039]: "Test" #45: STATE_QUICK_R2: IPsec SA
established tunnel mode {ESP=>0x20e9b4b8 <0x65bd9c08 xfrm=3DES_0-HMAC_MD5 NATOA=none
NATD=none DPD=none}
the SPI's don't match and neither do the state numbers. The delete is
from state #3 but the SPIs are from #44 and #45 :)
These are nog the logs we are looking for :)
Paul
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
