On 28 February 2016 at 18:39, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > New commits: > commit 690fc62ba42febcb5b7c7040b6027756fe3c318f > Author: Paul Wouters <[email protected]> > Date: Sun Feb 28 18:39:05 2016 -0500 > > testing: Added basic-pluto-00 which runs the lib/libswan tests
Something on my build todo list is to try convincing everyone that libswan should be abandoned; instead build: libpluto.a in programs/pluto and link whack, cavp, pluto, and the above tests against that. I guess this is as good a trigger as any for that discussion :-) It's not that I've something against libraries, just that here, the effort seems to have stalled so badly and for so long that it now just creates confusion. If a library or libraries is really desirable then first straighten out pluto. thoughts? > Currently that's algparse and enumparse > > _______________________________________________ > Swan-commit mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-commit _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
