On Sun, 26 Jun 2016, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Obviously. But notice how "i*", "r*", and "t*" are in alphabetic
order so the script run order can easily be determined using "LANG=C
ls -1 *.sh" (or the python equivalent); perhaps you have better names
that capture the same intent and preserve alpabetic ordering (which
can't be said of *init.sh *run.sh NN*.sh and final.sh).
What about this, instead let the names specify that they can run on
multiple machines. For instance:
00-east-west.sh -- run on east, then run on west
01-west.sh
99-west-east.sh -- again, but this time on west, and then on east
or:
00-nic.sh
01-east.sh
02-road.sh
10-road.sh
99-east-road.sh
I agree that "init" and "run" are artifical names and if we support
numbers, we might as well get rid of those identifiers.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
