| From: Andrew Cagney <[email protected]> | On 21 March 2017 at 11:02, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: | > | > That's because since we converted to libevent, we have no way of | > listing these events to find them and delete them. | | Yea, they are global in the sense that they don't seem to be tied to a | state, and reschedule themselves when they trigger:
Off the top of my head (I'm really short of time; sorry): 1) leaks of O(1) are of no consequence. There is only a small fixed number of these events (I think) and so they are not a leak problem. 2) I think that there was a prefix in the name of an allocation that meant that the leak detective should ignore it. _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
