As you've all noticed I've been tweaking functions here and there replacing 'struct state' with with the more specific 'struct ike_sa'. It is so that in crypto and some other code I no longer need to wonder if the state is a parent or child. But there's the problem - notice how my description used the term 'parent' and not 'IKE SA':
- IKE SA is the term used by IKEv2 (parent doesn't appear in the RFC) - I suspect the IKEv1 word might be ISAKMP SA (regardless 'parent' doesn't appear there either) - Given a naming choice I try to lift terms found in the IKEv2 RFC (IKEv2 does use the term CHILD SA, I suspect IKEv1 used IPSEC SA) however: - pluto is littered with comments and macros referring to parent so I wonder if, for pluto and its code base, parent_sa would be a better term Andrew _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
