Did this: # fedora 24..28 hack. run swan-transmogrify to initialze Network # interscace It does not seems to run the first time when called from # /etc/rc.d/rc.local This slows down installation. If you 7 prefixes # it could cost 40 min:) KVM_F26_HACK=$(KVMSH) --shutdown $(1)$(2) '/testing/guestbin/swan-transmogrify'
ever get resolved? When using a dedicated build domain (which then gets cloned to test domains) this also hurts - all the clones need an extra reboot. On Thu, 21 Jun 2018 at 10:58, Antony Antony <[email protected]> wrote: > > As soon as the 3.24 is released lets move to F28 guests for tests. > My initial experiments look promising. I committed .ks and .mk for F28. > During the past few weeks I ran tests a few times with F28. > I think about 480 - 500 tests will migrate easily. The rest, some will > need fixing in output. Some output changes are probably the typical noise. > > Upgrading Strongswan to what comes with F28 will need some work. > It is better to do it at once. Initially I am forcing the installation to use > an older version, what is used with F22. > May be "ipsec look" need more fixing, but we will see. > > A good time move would be right after the release > After the release hold on to commits for few more days, to fix the > differences in output due to F28. I guess it may take 2-4 days at least. If > we can co-ordinate it. > > -antony > > > On Fri, May 11, 2018 at 09:57:06AM -0400, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > (not as the target) > > Just FYI, > > My test run finished and the results look consistent with F27 and > > testing.libreswan.org > > Andrew > > _______________________________________________ > > Swan-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
