| From: Paul Wouters <[email protected]> | Sure. We need support for .mobileconfig support so people can just | import that on Linux as well as Apple devices. I don't know how to | create a "profile" for Windows. I would be nice if we could do that | too.
Fine. But that isn't what I asked for. To be at feature-parity with WireGuard, we don't need to interoperate. Simple(!!!) libreswan to libreswan is what is required. Any bonus features should be separate and later so that they don't interfere with the simplicity. Did I say "simple" often enough? It's got to be simple. Its got to look simple to someone who knows nothing about this stuff. It's almost an advertisement, but one that actually is useful and informative. It's got to be as simple as WireGuard. Simpler that WireGuard would be a big bonus. Sadly, I think that there need to be "field notes" to trouble-shoot first-time bring-up. That's way more important that talking about added features. Lots of people have trouble getting this stuff working in the most basic way and end up giving up, scarred for life. If our diagnostics make debugging such a simple setup hard, we ought to look closely at making this easier. Perhaps we need a bring-up mode that is more helpful. Perhaps we need a tool that automates some of the debugging. _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
