On Thu, 18 Oct 2018, Andrew Cagney wrote:
Given this, I'm planning on renaming .st_msgid (and likely the above).
Since we've settled on v[12]* as the name prefix convention several
new names come to mind:
- st_v1_msgid
- v1st_msgid
- v1_st_msgid
any preference? The st_msgid_* fields listed above will also get a
rename, but one that also adds responder/initiator.
All variables inside struct state have a st_ prefix. Please keep that
prefix. so st_v1_msgid is fine.
(PS: I've also a strong preference for sticking v2 somewhere in any
v2-only thing as that way I know it isn't generic and may have to
handle ikev1)
Fine with me.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
