On Fri, 3 May 2019, Antony Antony wrote:
thanks for digging out more cruft. I tested with pfkey disabled. Now seems
basic things work.
I am confused about your patch. It seems to mix up renaming and removal
pfkey together.
I sugest we split these. So far I have 4 patches for functionality.
Sure, it can be split.
Note that 0001-pfkey.patch and 0002-pfkey.patch are wrong. If you looked
at my patch you could see that I replaced the checks for /proc/net/pfkey
with a check for /proc/net/xfrm_stat. That way we can still report an
error if the XFRM code is not loaded and could not be modprobed. Similar
to the original code.
Note that now I am looking at 0004-pfkey.patch, we surely got into more
complicated changes, and I no longer think this should go into 3.28.
Paul
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
