On Tue, 6 Aug 2019 at 07:34, Tuomo Soini <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 18:56:54 -0400 (EDT) > Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > > > > On Mon, 5 Aug 2019 at 14:26, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I am aware - the good thing is we are on f30, ready for > > > rhel8/centos8 and can pick namespaces or kvm with roughly the same > > > result. I’m working on getting us back to “normal” > > > > > > > > > KVM_OS points at fedora28? > > as in:
mk/kvm-targets.mk:KVM_OS = fedora28 > > Wasn't that the OS of the host? not of the guests? > > I think I changed libreswan-web/slave/Makefile.inc.local to > > KVM_OS=fedora30 > It's the guest (the test framework should be host agnostic). This explains why trying to compare local results with testing has been an exercise in frustration - it's not been testing top-of-tree. Per Tuomo's suggestion, I'll rename KVM_OS to KVM_GUEST_OS (and KVM_VARIANT_OS which is a hack to pacify a libvirt warning). We've an f30 tester set up under f30/ (see earlier posts). I'll re-start it as in: cd f30 ; rm -f nohup.out ; nohup master/testing/web/tester.sh slave/ results/ & I've also made results/ a soft-link to ../testing/f30 so that they can be seen under https://testing.libreswan.org/f30/ > I've been confused with the KVM_OS / KVM_VARIANT_OS variables before > > especially in the testing.libreswan master/slave setup. > > Correct naming would be KVM_HOST_OS and KVM_GUEST_OS. > > > -- > Tuomo Soini <[email protected]> > Foobar Linux services > +358 40 5240030 > Foobar Oy <https://foobar.fi/> > _______________________________________________ > Swan-dev mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev >
_______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
