Look in nic.console.verbose.txt

type=SYSCALL msg=audit(1567646808.958:61): arch=c000003e syscall=165
success=yes exit=0 a0=0 a1=55cef7279d60 a2=0 a3=1031 items=1 ppid=1
pid=486 auid=4294967295 uid=0 gid=0 euid=0 suid=0 fsuid=0 egid=0
sgid=0 fsgid=0 tty=(none)

I'm not sure what to do with them.  Same with the KERNEL barfs we're triggering.


On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 at 23:48, D. Hugh Redelmeier <[email protected]> wrote:

> A number of tests seem to be failing for a reason I don't understand.
>
> testing/pluto/ikev1-algo-esp-null-01 failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/ikev1-hostpair-01 failed east:output-different nic:%NULL
> road:output-different
> testing/pluto/ikev1-hostpair-02 failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/ikev2-hostpair-02 failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/ikev2-hostpair-03-initial-contact failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-cop-cop failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-cop-clear failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-private-poc failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-private-private failed nic:%NULL
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-private-clear failed nic:%NULL
> road:output-different
> testing/pluto/newoe-18-clear-poc failed nic:%NULL road:output-different
>
> I *think* that's because testing/utils/fab/post.py line 295 is looking for
> a .../OUTPUT/nic.pluto.log and isn't finding one.
>
> There don't seem to be any nic.pluto.log files in any of the OUTPUT
> directories.
>
> Is this error pointing out something broken in my setup, or is this
> warning spurious?  I don't see this problem here:
>   <https://testing.libreswan.org/v3.28-693-g1a0ab7452-master/>
> _______________________________________________
> Swan-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
>
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev

Reply via email to