On Wed, 22 Jan 2020 at 15:08, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Wed, 22 Jan 2020, Antony Antony wrote: > > >> I still believe yes/no is not appropriate here. As for using numbers or > >> %unique, we already have that being used for the mark keyword(s) in the > >> parser. So that functionality is already there. > > > > I disagree. I think no|yes|<n> is cleaner for this kind of option. > > Hence I choose the new convention. > > As no other people are weighing in, I'll stop objecting provided the > parser crashers are resolved.
How does the manual page describe the behaviour? Presumably the meaning of "no", "yes", and <n> do not overlap. _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
