On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:46, Andrew Cagney <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, 29 Jun 2020 at 17:19, Paul Wouters <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > New commits:
> > commit b98c10dc015c6c6bbc34c2020f7f5b20cf3483c8
> > Author: Paul Wouters <[email protected]>
> > Date:   Mon Jun 29 17:16:47 2020 -0400
> >
> >     libipsecconf: promote ah= / esp= as desired keywords over phase2alg=
> >
> >     This is a reversal of what we tried to do in the past. Since IKEv2
> >     does not really talk about phase2 anymore, this term is no longer
> >     favoured.
>
> Ya!

To clarify one thing, does this mean that:
      ah=sha1
implies AH?

>
> >     Ideally, phase2=ah|esp would also get renamed, but what word to use?
> >
> >     (type is already used for tunnel|transport, and mode= would be confused
> >      with transport|tunnel mode. And encapsulation=ah would be weird because
> >      there is no encapsulation. And no one wants ah=yes)
>
> Right, mode is either transport or tunnel.
> Encapsulation, however, refers to UDP / TCP.
> (It's really confusing that the E in ESP is also encapsulate).
> The RFC seems to refer to ESP and AH as child SAs (which does make sense).
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Swan-commit mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-commit
_______________________________________________
Swan-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev

Reply via email to