On Sun, 3 Jan 2021 at 09:31, Andrew Cagney <[email protected]> wrote: > > I suspect it has something to do with XFRMI. As best I can, in the > current code, it is simply being passed to up-down scripts as > INTERFACE_IP=...? > While the name ifaceip leads me to think it's got something to do with > the host interfaces, I suspect it is connected to the XFRMI client > interface IP (if this is true I'll rename the field to > client_interface_ip)?
PS: should text_cidr_to_subnet(), which parses the field, reject "::/<anything>"? Currently it is silently ignored. _______________________________________________ Swan-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan-dev
