On 03/02/14 at 02:42, Alex Elsayed wrote: > Well, your throughput may not be increasing in the tests you ran, but what's > the load like? It may be that the crypto isn't the _bottleneck_ (and thus > making the crypto faster won't result in better benchmarks), but saving > resources that might otherwise be spent on crypto for other things may still > be valuable.
I agree, but why is this one special case (2.6.32 KLIPS AES-NI) that is increasing the throughput on the same machine, same setup as in the other 3 centos scenarios? That is what confuses me :) -- Andreas Herz _______________________________________________ Swan mailing list [email protected] https://lists.libreswan.org/mailman/listinfo/swan
