And I'll let you know if it fixes the bug in my hundreds of flash animations...
On 5/11/06,
daniel fischer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey Quentin,
i found the little bugger responsible for that mistake, and put a lot of bugspray on it. seems fixed in svn. do you need/want a prerelease?
-dan
Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > (on Fri, 21 Apr 2006 11:56:43 +0200):
> I'll post that bug...
>
> On 4/21/06, Steve Webster <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi erixtekila/mark,
> >
> > > On 4/21/06, Quentin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Here is what I did, according to what you suggested :
> > > >
> > > > Put together a FLA with only a dynamic textfield on the stage with an
> > > > instance name "tf"
> > > > Wrote an ActionScript class that simply sets the textfield content to
> > 9.8
> > > > Injected the code via MTASCThe updated SWF works fine, the textfield
> > > > displays 9.8.
> > > > Then I placed the SWF with a simple swfmill XML file and the bug I had
> > > > appears : the textfield is filled with 9.80000019073486 !
> > >
> > > Wow... this is strange. I don't have time to look at the swfml-ll of
> > > the SWF before and after swfmill import right now, unfortunately, but
> > > I suspect it has something to do with black magick.
> > > Maybe Dan or Steve can help?
> >
> > I suspect this is due to C++ handling of float values, but I can't be
> > sure. Can someone please post this as a bug on the Trac site?
--
http://0xDF.com/
http://iterative.org/
_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
_______________________________________________ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org