Hey Jon, good to hear you're still in. Basically, what kind of documentation you'd want to write is of course up to you- anything helps. What seems most important to me, though, is geting a comprehensive reference to the swfml-simple functionality, with examples. Very much like Mark's guide or the osflash page (but complete). The OSFlash page also misses some basic introduction into swfmill's function as a XSLT processor, the difference between lowlevel and simple dialects, etc..
> My offer still stands for documentation. I need someone to first tell > me what type of documentation I'm drafting as I'm incapable of deciding. As for the "hacks", that would of course be interesting too, but to me they have a much lower priority-- as anyone capable of creating a swfmill-XSLT-based hack will also have the competence to dig into it's function from what little info there is... Thanks also to Marc and Brian for the heads-up and success report. I've received another "0.2.11.22 works ok on my ~350 SWFs" off-list, so that makes three-- two more success reports to go before i'm willing to release (Note that if swfmill receives more fixes, we'll have to test again-- so be quick). -dan -- http://0xDF.com/ http://iterative.org/ _______________________________________________ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org