Hey Jon,

good to hear you're still in. Basically, what kind of documentation you'd want 
to write is of course up to you- anything helps. What seems most important to 
me, though, is geting a comprehensive reference to the swfml-simple 
functionality, with examples. Very much like Mark's guide or the osflash page 
(but complete). The OSFlash page also misses some basic introduction into 
swfmill's function as a XSLT processor, the difference between lowlevel and 
simple dialects, etc..

  > My offer still stands for documentation.  I need someone to first tell
  > me what type of documentation I'm drafting as I'm incapable of deciding.

As for the "hacks", that would of course be interesting too, but to me they 
have a much lower priority-- as anyone capable of creating a swfmill-XSLT-based 
hack will also have the competence to dig into it's function from what little 
info there is...


Thanks also to Marc and Brian for the heads-up and success report. I've 
received another "0.2.11.22 works ok on my ~350 SWFs" off-list, so that makes 
three-- two more success reports to go before i'm willing to release (Note that 
if swfmill receives more fixes, we'll have to test again-- so be quick).

-dan


-- 
http://0xDF.com/
http://iterative.org/

_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org

Reply via email to