That doesn't really make sense to me. The placed object is an instance
of the class, its name has nothing to do with its class. If that were/is
the case then you would need a class definition for each instance which
would run counter to the point of using a class and would result in a
lot of pointless code. no?
In haxe you reiterate the base class definition in the haxe class file,
not the named instance. like so:
class Foo extends flash.display.MovieClip{}
at least thats working right to me.
Ralf Fuest wrote:
> It's nice to hear that you finally were able to do a successful build.
>
> When you specify a name attribute in a place tag you need to define a
> class in your as3 code with the same name. This is how it works in haXe:
>
> class MyFoo extends flash.display.MovieClip {
> }
>
> I'm not sure about the exact as3 syntax, but it should me similar.
>
> Ralf
>
>
>> just worth noting, if you are doing something like:
>>
>> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1" ?>
>> <movie width="500" height="400" as3="1" framerate="12" version="9">
>> <background color="#cccccc"/>
>> <frame>
>> <library>
>> <clip id="Foo" import="as3class.swf"/>
>> </library>
>> <place id="Foo" x="0" y="0" depth="1"/>
>> </frame>
>> </movie>
>>
>>
>> you can not set the name property for the placed clip. e.g. this breaks:
>>
>> <place id="Foo" name="myFoo" x="0" y="0" depth="1"/>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> swfmill mailing list
> swfmill@osflash.org
> http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
>
_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
