This is great news. I really like the premise of swfmill and to expect its 0.3.0 release makes me glad :-)
I assume your build was compiled from sources different than vanilla 0.2.12.6? Something probably more updated and patched? Also, I would need Bazaar version control system to get a copy of the active development branch, right? Cheers and good luck. On Mon, Oct 5, 2009 at 17:35, Daniel Cassidy <m...@danielcassidy.me.uk> wrote: > 2009/10/5 armen...@gmail.com <armen...@gmail.com>: >> I find it tragic that the source is almost three years old, and that >> one has to google to find the unpublished http://www.swfmill.org/pre >> URL. I am pretty sure it has been worked on since 2007 and that it was >> packaged into some form of source directory tar and/or patched too. >> >> The situation does not speak well for open source flash community :-) >> >> Now, which is the latest version of this tool? I need it because I use >> the DefineBinary tag support, which is not available in the public >> release. > > My fault, sorry. > > You can download the source from Launchpad, or if you need Windows > binaries, you can use this build here: > http://www.danielcassidy.me.uk/swfmill/swfmill-2009-08-19.zip > > That build contains between zero and one known bugs*, and is pretty > much ready to become version 0.3.0. The only reason an actual release > hasn’t happened is because I haven’t yet tied up all the loose ends. > For example, I don’t want to put out an official release that fails to > credit major contributors, advises users to send bug reports to the > wrong place, or contains otherwise inaccurate documentation. > > *There is a bug reported on Launchpad, but I think it might already be > fixed in trunk. > > Dan. > > _______________________________________________ > swfmill mailing list > swfmill@osflash.org > http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org > _______________________________________________ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
