Hi Russ,
2010/1/12 Russ Adams <rad...@cafeid.com>:
> If I change the TextRecord7's to TextRecord6's, do you think swfmill 0.3.0
> will retain them?
Sorry for the delay responding.
The quickest solution to your problem is to convert your xml to swf
using swfmill 0.2.6:
swfmill xml2swf foo.xml foo.swf
and then convert it back to XML using swfmill 0.3.0:
swfmill swf2xml foo.swf foo.swf.xml
You will see that the TextRecord7s become:
<TextRecord6 isSetup="1" objectID="1" y="220" fontHeight="240">
<color>
<Color red="0" green="0" blue="0"/>
</color>
</TextRecord6>
<TextRecord6 isSetup="0">
<glyphs>
<TextEntry glyph="65" advance="210"/>
<TextEntry glyph="66" advance="240"/>
<TextEntry glyph="67" advance="188"/>
</glyphs>
</TextRecord6>
<TextRecord6 isSetup="0">
<glyphs/>
</TextRecord6>
It’s a bit of a mystery to me why this seems to work, because the SWFs
being produced by swfmill 0.2.6 ought to be unreadable. Unfortunately
I don’t really have time to investigate right now.
swfmill 0.3.0 expects DefineText to contain TextRecord6, and
DefineText2 to contain TextRecord7. This is correct behaviour.
swfmill 0.2.6 expected both DefineText and DefineText2 to contain
TextRecord6 if you are targeting SWF version 6 or below, or
TextRecord7 if you are targeting SWF version 7 or above. This is
incorrect.
The official SWF spec defines a single TEXTRECORD data structure with
the following caveat:
Field: TextColor
Type: If StyleFlagsHasColor, RGB; If this record is part of a
DefineText2 tag, RGBA
swfmill has to treat this as two different data structures due to
swfmill’s internal design.
Hope this helps, let me know if you need more info.
Cheers,
Dan.
_______________________________________________
swfmill mailing list
swfmill@osflash.org
http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
