Hi,
> of distributing unmodifiable software is antisocial and should I don't know where you got the part of me distributing swfmill? I explicitly said I was NOT going to distribute ANY part of swfmill. I merely want to make an option if users had downloaded and installed swfmill themselves already. I have no wish to distribute any 3rd party executable that maybe 1% of my users would like. Does not make sense to do that. Would be huge downloads! :) > Have you considered an alternative business plan ? I already now earn my own living from selling my software. But now and then, people request flash parsing support. This leaves two choices: I can either write parser myself (which I may end up doing) or make an option for my software to use external application if users care enough to download themselves. And no, I don't think that is an antisocial concept. As I even pointed out in my email... That even if I could use swfmill with GPL license, I would not do it if the authors of swfmill did not like it. I really don't get how you can present that as antisocial.... But whatever :) best regards Thomas Schulz _______________________________________________ swfmill mailing list swfmill@osflash.org http://osflash.org/mailman/listinfo/swfmill_osflash.org
