Thanks Steve, It's not a bad list. I'll ponder it a bit. I still have major problems with the notion of standards compliance in a world where it seems like no one is actually following the standards. ;) Don't get me started on x-platform css... :X
:) Vincent On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 11:16 AM, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi Vincent, > > This seems to cover the reasons nicely: > > > http://www.nolagraphics.com/news/2007/10/25/why-are-coding-standards-w3c-important-to-me-as-a-business-owner/ > > Steve > > > On Jun 8, 10:31 am, Vincent Polite <[email protected]> > wrote: > > This seemed like an appropriate thread to hijack, but I do have a > question > > for those who may be more in the know about this than I am.... > > > > Why is it that we care whether or not a web page is standards compliant? > If > > the various web browser manufacturers that make up the majority of our > > userbase aren't strictly compliant with a particular web standard... what > > good does it do our web pages to have every little detail nuanced up for > a > > particular doctype/standard? > > > > Just curious; it's a question that has bothered me for quite some time. > > > > Vincent > > > > On Sun, Jun 7, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > I meant XHTML. > > > > > On Jun 7, 7:46 pm, Steve <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Hi All, > > > > > > FYI... > > > > > > Enhance 1.2 is now W3C XHTML 1.0 standards compliant. > > > > > > Steve > > > > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
