Jason- FAQ #1 is explicitly about this issue. I'm confused why you think it's not?
--Kyle -------------------------------------------------- From: "Jason Fincanon" <[email protected]> Sent: Tuesday, December 22, 2009 10:07 PM To: "SWFObject" <[email protected]> Subject: Re: SWFObject 2.2 and FireFox 3.5.5 problem > Indeed the FAQ usually is a great place to start, Aran. > > The only problem with that in this instance is that this one wasn't > found in the FAQ. It was found buried deep within the issues list. On > top of that, it appears to have been closed and considered "invalid". > I'm not sure how it can be invalid if it's an actual problem. As a > matter of fact, I actually talked to quite a few developers today who > reported having the same exact problem. > > Maybe it needs to be added to the FAQ so other people can find it > there when they start, huh? > > But thanks for the help and words of encouragement! :) > -Jason > > On Dec 22, 4:30 pm, Aran Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: >> Yeah. >> >> Reading the FAQ is a great place to start for any issues you may be >> facing. >> Chances are, other users have travelled then same path. >> >> Aran >> >> >> >> On Wed, Dec 23, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jason Fincanon <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > Found a solution. >> > Check out the <style> in comment #5: >> >http://code.google.com/p/swfobject/issues/detail?id=349#c5 >> >> > On Dec 22, 12:37 pm, Jason Fincanon <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > I'm having the exact same problem. Here's my html template code: >> >> > > <!-- saved from url=(0014)about:internet --> >> > > <!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN" " >> >http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd";> >> > > <html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"; lang="en" xml:lang="en"> >> > > <head> >> > > <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" >> > href="history/history.css" /> >> > > <title>${title}</title> >> > > <meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; >> > > charset=iso-8859-1" /> >> > > <script type="text/javascript" >> > src="js/swfobject.js"></script> >> > > <script type="text/javascript"> >> > > var flashvars = {linkName:"chatLink"}; >> > > var params = {menu:"false"}; >> > > var attributes = {id: "${application}",name: >> > "${application}"}; >> > > swfobject.embedSWF ( "${swf}.swf", >> > "${application}_div", "$ >> > > {width}", "${height}", "${version_major}.${version_minor}.$ >> > > {version_revision}", "expressInstall.swf", flashvars, params, >> > > attributes ); >> > > swfobject.addLoadEvent(loadEventHandler); >> > > function loadEventHandler() { >> > > BrowserHistory.flexApplication = >> > swfobject.getObjectById("$ >> > > {application}"); >> > > }; >> > > </script> >> > > </head> >> > > <body> >> > > <div id="${application}_div"> >> > > <h1>Alternative content</h1> >> > > <p><a href=" >> >http://www.adobe.com/go/getflashplayer";><img >> > > src="http://www.adobe.com/images/shared/download_buttons/ >> > > get_flash_player.gif" alt="Get Adobe Flash player" /></a></p> >> > > </div> >> > > </body> >> > > </html> >> >> > > On Nov 17, 4:27 pm, Aran Rhee <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > > > Tom. >> >> > > > While I can appreciate that your page is not working in FF, we >> > > > cannot >> > begin >> > > > to help without seeing your code. Please post a link your page, so >> > people >> > > > can have a look. >> >> > > > Cheers, >> > > > Aran >> >> > > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 7:13 AM, Tom <[email protected]> >> > > > wrote: >> >> > > > > Hey all, >> >> > > > > Just wanted to share this with the group. I was using SWFObject >> > > > > 2.2 >> > > > > to embed a SWF into a generic HTML wrapper. The HTML literally >> > > > > had >> > > > > nothing more than the JS and DIV tag needed to get this thing >> > > > > running. When I tossed my finished product on the web I could >> > > > > view >> > it >> > > > > in Safari, IE 6 through 8, Google Chrome, and Opera. I could not >> > view >> > > > > it in FireFox 3.5.5 When I switched my SWFObject wrapper with the >> > > > > HTML wrapper that is automatically generated by Flex I could then >> > view >> > > > > my SWF in FireFox. Again, the SWFObject wrapper that I was using >> > > > > did >> > > > > not contain any CSS or any other JS calls that would cause the >> > > > > file >> > to >> > > > > typically only work in certain browsers. >> >> > > > > Tom >> >> > > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ >> > > > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the >> > > > > Google >> > Groups >> > > > > "SWFObject" group. >> > > > > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] >> > > > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > > > > [email protected]<swfobject%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups >> > > > > >> > > > > .com> >> > <swfobject%[email protected]<swfobject%252bunsubscr...@googleg >> > >> > roups.com> >> >> > > > > For more options, visit this group at >> > > > >http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en >> > > > > -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~--- >> >> > -- >> >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> > Groups >> > "SWFObject" group. >> > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> > [email protected]<swfobject%2bunsubscr...@googlegroups >> > >> > .com> >> > . >> > For more options, visit this group at >> >http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en. > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "SWFObject" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]. > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "SWFObject" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/swfobject?hl=en.
