Hi, Mathhias,
Before we have a fix for the gradient problem, is there any way to disable
gradient processing? The result img will look worse, but we can significantly
reduce the chances of hitting the obj limit.
Thanks,
Ted
----- Original Message ----
From: Erik Proud <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, October 1, 2007 9:55:34 AM
Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] swf only supports 65536 shapes
Hi, Matthias,
We're seeing the "swf only supports 65536 shapes" Ted reported earlier
quite often. I understand there're tons of things you need to deal with, am
just wondering if you have some rough idea when it will be fixed.
Thanks,
Erik
> cool!
> This gradient optimization along with the memory consumption optimization
> (loading each > frame costs 2mb memroy on average, sometimes 50mb) will make
> significantly
> improvement on the product. We're looking forward to it! thanks, Matthias!
>
> Ted
> ----- Original Message ----
> From: Matthias Kramm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: [email protected]
> Sent: Thursday, August 2, 2007 10:22:33 AM
> Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] swf only supports 65536 shapes
>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2007 at 08:52:01AM -0700, Ted Chen wrote:
>> The pdf illustrate the problem is here.
>> http://www.filesend.net/download.php?f=fd3a8e381a82144ab4daff6233a17072
>
> It's the gradients. As gradients are currently converted by using
> several shapes per object, a single PDF polygon containing a gradient may
> cause a few hundred SWF objects to be generated.
> Converting gradients from PDF to gradients in SWF is something on
> my current TODO list.
>
> Greetings
>
> Matthias
____________________________________________________________________________________
Tonight's top picks. What will you watch tonight? Preview the hottest shows on
Yahoo! TV.
http://tv.yahoo.com/
