Hi Matthias, I'm not talking about multiple pages in a single file, I'm talking about 1 page in 1 file.
I run this command to produce a swf for page 1 pdf2swf somefile.pdf -F fonts -f -p 1 -s insertstop -s enablezlib -s flashversion=8 -s internallinkfunction=_root.internalLink -s zoom=75 -s ignoredraworder -s jpegquality=50 -s fontquality=50 %3 -o swfpage_1.swf I may have to run this command several times for each page in the pdf So I tried the following with %d to automatically create 1 swf file for each page pdf2swf somefile.pdf -F fonts -f -s insertstop -s enablezlib -s flashversion=8 -s internallinkfunction=_root.internalLink -s zoom=75 -s ignoredraworder -s jpegquality=50 -s fontquality=50 -o swfpage_%d.swf (I may have typed it incorrectly as I am out of the office) What I noticed was that the pages created with %d were much bigger than the ones created with separate commands. Swfpage_1.swf was 100k using the first method. Swfpage_1.swf was 150k using the second method. Why would this be ? Regards Tony -----Original Message----- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matthias Kramm Sent: Thursday, September 04, 2008 9:39 AM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [Swftools-common] %d can produce larger SWF files On Wed, Sep 03, 2008 at 11:28:36AM -0400, Tony Stallan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been converting each page of my PDF's individually and then I > noticed the %d option. > > Great I thought, however when using %d the resultant SWF files are > much larger (50%) then the individually created SWF's. Very well possible- when multiple pages are stored in a single file, they can share information like fonts, bitmaps etc. With only one page per file, that's not happening anymore, so the files are larger. Greetings Matthias
