On Fri, Oct 02, 2009 at 09:24:10AM +0300, Kai Lautaportti <[email protected]> wrote: > Ok, looking at the code I see the all PIL functionality is wrapped > inside #ifdef HAVE_PYTHON_IMAGING. > > The current setup.py however doesn't support opting out of PIL. Would > you be more comfortable with implementing a choice of using PIL in > setup.py instead of (optionally) leaving out SWF alltogether as it is > in my proposed patch?
Actually, I think we should just drop SWF PIL support in setup.py. If a user really wants SWF and PIL on top of that (anybody reading this: if you're that user, I want to know about it), he can just compile SWF using configure+make. Dropping PIL support, I think we can continue compiling SWF together with gfx without encountering any portability issues, right? Matthias
