ok it is not very important you can do the same with -o option i aggree
with you
and change the output name
but the modification asked was so tiny ...
if you have to extract several jpg for example now
swfextract -j 1 dummy.swf -o pic1.jpg
swfextract -j 2 dummy.swf -o pic2.jpg
swfextract -j 3 dummy.swf -o pic3.jpg
instead of
swfextract -j 1 dummy.swf
swfextract -j 2 dummy.swf
swfextract -j 3 dummy.swf
it does not matter in fact
Matthias Kramm a écrit :
On Thu, Dec 17, 2009 at 10:41:28AM +0100, jean-michel.voicechat_fan
<[email protected]> wrote:
i suggested you a very small & simple change which can be usefull in
swfextract.c
line 9 in function handlejpeg replace filename ="output.jpg" ; by
filename =name ;
That'll only cause a difference if you only specified a single object
(image) to extract, and then you can specify an output filename using
-o anyway.
So I'm not sure what the benefit of that change would be. Could you
describe more explicitly what you're trying to accomplish?
Matthias
