Ty, I'm not really a project maintainer. so I don't have access to the SWFtools website. Also, as far as I am aware, SWFTools is still Herr Matthias Kramm's pet project, and he should really give his stampof approval to all changes made to the sources.
That said, if you feel there is a definite need for this, then I could apply the patch to the source of say, 0.9.0 [cross-]compile, then post a link to the resulting executable. Anyone else say Aye or Nay? Perhaps it should also be added to the current git repository? Regards, Chris. On 7 May 2010 16:12, Ty ... <[email protected]> wrote: > Windows. > (When will the binaries be available on the website? I did attempt to > compile it myself, and got at least far enough to have it create > swfstrings.exe and wav2swf.exe but C isn't really my language of > choice, so I didn't follow through to the end :P) > > -Ty > > > > On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 9:58 PM, Chris Pugh <[email protected]> wrote: >> The patch appears to apply, and successfully compile with, >> >> swftools-2010-02-06-1900.tar.gz >> >> swftools-0.9.0.tar.gz >> >> and git repository, >> >> git clone git://git.swftools.org/swftools >> >> What are you under, Windows or Linux? >> >> Two things strike.. >> >> - are any more forgotten patches? >> >> - codebase is only small, was wondering if I should mirror it? >> >> Regards, >> >> >> Chris. >> >> On 6 May 2010 17:39, Ty <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> This guy >>>> supplied a patch to extract the alpha channel to it's own png, however it >>>> doesn't look like it was ever applied... >>>> >>>> <link> >>> >>> The first link got mangled somehow... here is the link to the patch: >>> >>> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/swftools-common/2009-11/msg00178.html >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > >
