thats an interesting point. open source flash would be unbeatable.
i was thinking a lot about what steve jobs wrote in his letter about flash
... now its just nonsense to me because flash on the iPad would result in
native apps and html5 "apps" would run in the safari browser (web view)
which is not native on the cpu but interpreted by the browser ... so this is
absolute bullshit. its just that he dont want to let developers work with
other systems than apple. thats all.

html5 is in no way comparable to flash - i have to state that again. html5
is interpreted by the browser and flash is a plugin that natively runs on
the cpu (just like any plugin, for example "quake live" - which has full
access to the cpu) ... this hype is about nothing. and who wants to make big
projects where everyone is be able to read the sourcecode of ???

maybe i'm a hardliner but in this case i just can't see what it's all about,
  filip

On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 6:39 PM, Rodolfo Gonzalez Gonzalez
<[email protected]>wrote:

> On 07/05/10 09:56, Martin Perez wrote:
>
>> Thanks Lasconic. I didn't find any HTML5 based document until now.  Is it
>> me
>> or that viewer is quite crappy? Just a bunch of images put together in the
>> same page...
>>
>
>
>
> Yep, I don't like the idea of having all the document in a very long page.
> And sometimes I don't like the idea of text being easily copied. I believe
> that this move was caused by the iPad. I'm usually in favor of W3C
> standards, if they were correctly implemented by every browser. I think this
> situation will force Adobe to make Flash an open source technology.
>
> Regards.
>
>
>
>

Reply via email to