On Tue, Feb 8, 2011 at 8:58 AM, Chris <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, 8 Feb 2011 01:02:16 +0000 > Ricardo Pedroso <[email protected]> wrote: > >> 2011/2/7 Pablo Rodríguez <[email protected]>:
>> > Is this intended or is it a bug? If this is intended, is there any way > >> > >to get the old settings working? >> Just guessing... >> Is it possible that your 0.9.0 is compile with lame enable and 0.9.1 is >not? > In any event, why would libmp3lame affect the encoding of a wave file? libmp3lame is a mp3 encoder, so I was thinking that swfc could be taken a wav and automaticaly convert to an mp3. But I take a quick look at the code and it seems that was not the case. A wav will be defined as a wav and a mp3 as a mp3 in the resulting swf. So my guessing was wrong. :-/ Ricardo
