Sorry, this fell off my radar. I’ll test and merge again. - Tony
> On Oct 27, 2016, at 2:56 AM, Luke Howard <lu...@padl.com> wrote: > > BTW is anything blocking integrating SR-2416? > > https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/574 > <https://github.com/apple/swift-corelibs-foundation/pull/574> > > That allows value types to be archived too if they support _ObjectBridgeable > (they’ll come back as reference types though). > >> On 27 Oct 2016, at 4:22 AM, Tony Parker via swift-corelibs-dev >> <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >> >> >>> On Oct 26, 2016, at 10:14 AM, Max Desiatov <max.desia...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:max.desia...@gmail.com>> wrote: >>> >>> Hi Tony, >>> >>> This is very interesting caveat. Is there a plan to get this documented >>> anywhere? I haven't seen any documentation for Swift Foundation published >>> publicly anywhere akin to how it's done for other APIs at >>> https://developer.apple.com/reference/ >>> <https://developer.apple.com/reference/>. >>> >>> With best regards, Max. >> >> With respect to the NSObject requirement: It’s really more of a known issue >> than a permanent limitation. >> >> To over summarize the situation: NSKeyedArchiver (the Objective-C one) puts >> a private category on NSObject and assumes all objects respond to those >> messages after that. >> >> We don’t really have documentation for swift-corelibs-foundation beyond what >> we can put in our own headerdoc format there. That would be something I >> would really appreciate help on if anyone is interested in contributing. >> >> - Tony >> >>> >>>> On 26 Oct 2016, at 18:11, Tony Parker via swift-corelibs-dev >>>> <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Hi Sai, >>>> >>>> We do have basic support for keyed archiving and unarchiving in >>>> swift-corelibs-foundation on Linux. The limitation is that the NSCoding >>>> protocol cannot be applied to Swift struct types, only class types. On >>>> Darwin, the class also must be a subclass of NSObject. This last >>>> limitation may not exist on Linux, but you should be aware that if you >>>> encode a non-NSObject subclass on Linux then you would not be able to >>>> decode it on Darwin. >>>> >>>> - Tony >>>> >>>>> On Oct 26, 2016, at 4:07 AM, Sai Kanduri via swift-corelibs-dev >>>>> <swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org>> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hi Tony, >>>>> >>>>> From your comments on Pull Request #574 I understand that we cannot >>>>> archive/un-archive non-NS objects using NsKeyedArchiver & >>>>> NSKeyedUnarchiver.I s my understanding correct ..? Does this means that >>>>> archiving and un-archiving of swift types is not supported on Linux ? >>>>> >>>>> -Sai Hema >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list >>>>> swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org> >>>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev >>>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev> >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list >>>> swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org> >>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev >>>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-corelibs-dev mailing list >> swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org <mailto:swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org> >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev > > Luke Howard > web <http://lukehoward.com/> / facebook > <https://www.facebook.com/lukehowardmusic> / soundcloud > <https://soundcloud.com/lukehoward/> / spotify > <https://open.spotify.com/artist/3duTXsC49HoPt4f4EySDKf>
_______________________________________________ swift-corelibs-dev mailing list swift-corelibs-dev@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-corelibs-dev
