> On Dec 30, 2015, at 3:55 PM, Luke Howard <lu...@padl.com> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On 31 Dec 2015, at 10:24 AM, Philippe Hausler <phaus...@apple.com> wrote:
>> 
>> Yep and that is why I am holding off on merging this just yet until we can 
>> get something up and rolling from the stdlib to support this.
>> For now we could just limit these to the list of hand coded class to string 
>> conversions and omit the NSStringFromClass/NSClassFromString transform; that 
>> way we give the stdlib a bit of time to get back on their feet from the 
>> break and get this code in.
> 
> Your call; I know perfect is the enemy of good enough, but I’m definitely 
> interested in helping get something in stdlib once we decide on what to do 
> re: mangling etc.
> 
> — Luke

I really want to merge in the rest of the coders; so lets go ahead and omit the 
mangling stuff and leave it just as the Foundation classes . That will be a 
huge win in my book, it gives us something that is testable and functional 
enough to do some pretty impressive demonstrations of archiving.
_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to