The swift-ci tests have been regularly failing for the past several days. That 
makes it impossible to make progress for anyone who is trying to gate their own 
changes on pull request testing or even rely on local testing on trunk.

I thunk swift-ci would work if everyone followed some minimal standards for 
pre-commit testing:

- To commit anything nontrivial, use a pull request with @swift-ci Please smoke 
test and merge

- If your change is source breaking or may require updates in other 
repositories, run "utils/build-toolchain local.swift” on linux and darwin. All 
tests should pass and it should generate a tarball. Then use a pull request and 
merge all affected repositories at once.

- Watch the bots after you merge. Revert your change if anything breaks.

Andy

Current swift-ci incremental status:

> linux:
> 
> https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-15_10/6593/consoleFull#-1843642957ee1a197b-acac-4b17-83cf-a53b95139a76
> 
> TestFoundation/TestNSString.swift:1094:56: error: incorrect argument label in 
> call (have 'with:isEquivalent:', expected 'with:by:')
>    let expectHasPrefix = lhsNFDGraphemeClusters.starts(
>                                                       ^
> TestFoundation/TestNSString.swift:1097:54: error: incorrect argument label in 
> call (have 'with:isEquivalent:', expected 'with:by:')
>        lhsNFDGraphemeClusters.lazy.reversed().starts(
>                                                     ^
> ---
> darwin:
> 
> https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/5294/consoleFull#-115900982ee1a197b-acac-4b17-83cf-a53b95139a76
> 
> /Users/buildnode/jenkins/workspace/oss-swift-incremental-RA-osx/swift/stdlib/private/StdlibUnittestFoundationExtras/StdlibUnittestFoundationExtras.swift:71:19:
>  error: missing argument label 'invoking:' in call
>  autoreleasepool(body)
>                  ^
>                  invoking: 
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to