Not it.

5/21 Test  #5: dispatch_group ...................***Timeout  30.02 sec
      Start  6: dispatch_overcommit

> On Dec 14, 2017, at 3:30 PM, swift...@swift.org wrote:
> 
> [FAILURE] oss-swift-4.1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04 [#503]
> 
> Build URL:    
> https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-4.1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04/503/ 
> <https://ci.swift.org/job/oss-swift-4.1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04/503/>
> Project:      oss-swift-4.1-incremental-RA-linux-ubuntu-16_04
> Date of build:        Thu, 14 Dec 2017 16:46:30 -0600
> Build duration:       44 min
> Tests:
> 
> Name: Swift(linux-x86_64)
> Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 10111 test(s), Total: 10111 test(s)
> Name: Swift-Unit
> Failed: 0 test(s), Passed: 487 test(s), Total: 487 test(s)
> 
> Changes
> 
> Commit 31e6639f3c0fdadf04405b254a5bdb315017d03d by blangmuir:
> [parse] Recover better from malformed subscript decls for
> 
> edit: test/Parse/subscripting.swift
> edit: lib/Sema/TypeCheckDecl.cpp
> add: test/IDE/complete_type_subscript.swift
> edit: lib/AST/Decl.cpp
> edit: lib/Parse/ParseDecl.cpp
> 
> Commit 59e6994d720ffda78cf40b12832437729c68699c by nhawes:
> [Refactoring] Local rename in lazy block failing
> 
> edit: test/refactoring/SyntacticRename/Outputs/variables/ivar-x.swift.expected
> edit: test/refactoring/SyntacticRename/variables.swift
> add: 
> test/SourceKit/Refactoring/semantic-refactoring/local-rename-lazy.swift.expected
> edit: test/refactoring/SyntacticRename/Outputs/variables/var-y.swift.expected
> edit: test/refactoring/SyntacticRename/Outputs/variables/var-j.swift.expected
> edit: test/SourceKit/Refactoring/semantic-refactoring/local-rename.swift
> edit: 
> test/refactoring/SyntacticRename/Outputs/variables/pattern-b.swift.expected
> edit: lib/IDE/SwiftSourceDocInfo.cpp
> edit: 
> test/refactoring/SyntacticRename/Outputs/variables/pattern-a.swift.expected
> add: test/refactoring/SyntacticRename/Outputs/variables/lazy.swift.expected
> 
> Commit 75d4e223762f72518293023fc18d6b1b326d764d by shajrawi:
> hasValidLinkageForFragileRef: Add a test that checks if the containing
> 
> add: validation-test/compiler_crashers_2_fixed/0134-rdar35947198.swift
> edit: lib/SIL/SILFunction.cpp
> 
> Commit 762dabb798af7194dc552d69fbd544c823db563c by arphaman:
> [Sema] Don't emit -Wunguarded-availability for switch cases
> 
> edit: test/SemaObjC/unguarded-availability.m
> edit: lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
> 
> Commit d28cebab420974b7676896c467e647b084ddc424 by arphaman:
> [Sema] Improve some -Wunguarded-availability diagnostics
> 
> edit: include/clang/Basic/DiagnosticSemaKinds.td
> edit: test/SemaObjC/attr-availability.m
> edit: test/SemaObjC/unguarded-availability-new.m
> edit: lib/Sema/SemaDeclAttr.cpp
> edit: test/SemaObjC/unguarded-availability.m

_______________________________________________
swift-dev mailing list
swift-dev@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-dev

Reply via email to