> On Dec 19, 2015, at 7:32 PM, Amir Michail <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> 
>> On Dec 19, 2015, at 7:21 PM, Colin Barrett <[email protected]> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> I’d recommend you read 
>> http://tratt.net/laurie/blog/entries/the_bootstrapped_compiler_and_the_damage_done,
>>  which has a number of rebuttals to what you’ve said below.
>> 
> 
> That’s an interesting article but it doesn’t address the issue of whether 
> compiler code is more like normal programming than compiler standard library 
> code.

Perhaps I don’t understand what you mean, but the article gives two good 
reasons why compiler code is special. The first reason is that we understand a 
lot about how to design a compiler, much more than we understand about how to 
design other types of programs. The second follows:

> [C]ompilers are an atypical class of program. In essence, a compiler is a 
> simple batch pipeline process. A program is read in and translated to a tree; 
> a series of tree transformations are applied; and eventually one of those 
> trees is saved out as some sort of binary data (e.g. machine code or 
> bytecode). Most of the intermediate tree transformations calculate a 
> relatively simple bit of information about the program and create a slightly 
> modified tree based on it. A few calculations crop up time and time again, 
> such as: maps from variables to scopes or types; and stacks to determine 
> closures. Significantly, and unlike most programs in the real world, there is 
> no interaction with users: the compiler knows all it needs about the outside 
> world from the moment it is called.

Personally, I think the main reason not to rewrite the Swift compiler is that 
it would be a distraction from improving the Swift language and other 
associated tools.

-Colin

>>> On Dec 19, 2015, at 4:41 PM, Amir Michail via swift-evolution 
>>> <[email protected]> wrote:
>>> 
>>> Compiler code is probably more typical of what most programmers write than 
>>> library code and so would be ideal for suggesting further language 
>>> evolution ideas.
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> swift-evolution mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> 
> 

_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution

Reply via email to