> On Dec 19, 2015, at 7:55 PM, Jordan Rose via swift-evolution > <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: > > It's a nice, consistent proposal, but I don't feel like this solves any of > the complaints about the existing ternary operator: > > - It's not obvious what it does when you first learn it. > - The '?' doesn't have anything to do with Optionals. > > It is a way to put 'switch' into an expression. I'm not a fan of the two > different colons, but that's "just" syntax.
+1 to all that > Jordan > >> On Dec 18, 2015, at 14:04 , Paul Ossenbruggen via swift-evolution >> <swift-evolution@swift.org> wrote: >> >> All, >> >> I think, I finally might have the answer to improving ternary, with such a >> bold statement come some pretty high expectations but I think, I might >> actually have done it this time :-) >> >> I am calling it the Demux Expression, it builds on the benefits of ternary >> and switch while improving on those. >> >> https://github.com/possen/swift-evolution/blob/master/proposals/0024.md >> >> This is a first draft, thanks in advance for feedback! >> >> - Paul >> _______________________________________________ >> swift-evolution mailing list >> swift-evolution@swift.org >> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution > > _______________________________________________ > swift-evolution mailing list > swift-evolution@swift.org > https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution -Dave _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list swift-evolution@swift.org https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
