> The main reason to use `associated` is because the feature is called an > "associated type". If we're willing to rename the feature to "placeholder > type", then `placeholder` would be a good keyword. good point - maybe it's because I'm no native speaker, but for me "associated type" is just a technical term with no obvious meaning. _______________________________________________ swift-evolution mailing list [email protected] https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
Re: [swift-evolution] [SE-0011] Re-considering the replacement keyword for "typealias"
Tino Heth via swift-evolution Sun, 20 Dec 2015 03:58:52 -0800
- [swift-evolution] [SE-0011] Re-cons... Loïc Lecrenier via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [SE-0011... Tino Heth via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] [SE-... Andrew Hoos via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evolution] ... Brent Royal-Gordon via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evoluti... Charles Constant via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-evoluti... Tino Heth via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... Andrey Tarantsov via swift-evolution
- Re: [swif... Tino Heth via swift-evolution
- Re: [swift-ev... Jordan Rose via swift-evolution
- Re: [swif... Dave Abrahams via swift-evolution
- Re: [swif... Guillaume Lessard via swift-evolution
- Re: [... Erica Sadun via swift-evolution
