This is essentially the latest proposal that Paul offered.
Félix
> Le 22 déc. 2015 à 13:11:37, Thorsten Seitz <tseit...@icloud.com> a écrit :
>
> I still don't understand why we are not simply writing
>
> let i = switch color {
> case .Red: 0xFF0000
> case .Green: 0x00FF00
> case .Blue: 0x00000FF
> }
>
> No additional keywords, no wondering why different keywords and different
> syntax is used for something so similar. And not really longer than the
> alternative proposals (I do not count swapping "case" with "?" to be a gain,
> especially not if it requires to add a comma after each case).
>
> -Thorsten
>
>
> Am 22.12.2015 um 15:31 schrieb Charles Constant via swift-evolution
> <swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>>:
>
>> Just goofing on this a little. What if we called it a "which" statement,
>> instead of a "switch" statement? It's a bit cutesy, but not too verbose, and
>> it makes sense if you read it aloud.
>>
>> let i = which color {
>> ? .Red: 0xFF0000,
>> ? .Green: 0x00FF00,
>> ? .Blue: 0x00000FF
>> }
>>
>> let i = which boo {
>> ? true: 1,
>> ? false: 0,
>> ? nil: -1
>> }
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> swift-evolution mailing list
>> swift-evolution@swift.org <mailto:swift-evolution@swift.org>
>> https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
>> <https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution>
_______________________________________________
swift-evolution mailing list
swift-evolution@swift.org
https://lists.swift.org/mailman/listinfo/swift-evolution
